on retainer, really?

Yesterday’s blog post has now prompted threats of legal action against me. Privacy-impassioned Pete apparently has an attorney whom he is quick to say is paid on retainer, to take care of matters like this. He even used the word subpoena and phrase “just one phone call”. Other than this being completely laughable idea, considering the guy lives with his mother in a low-rent apartment, this is further confirmation of his bizarre, irrational audacity. If indeed he is so concerned for his own privacy, why in the world  would he text innumerable photos and video of his private parts, completely unprompted? I don’t want this stuff and never did — good thing I don’t know how to delete things from my phone, it might come in handy.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s